Citizen
Review Online

News & Commentary

Home

Subscribe
to this Newspaper

Archives

Donate

Contact Us

Subscribe to Newsletter

To subscribe to our newsletter simply add your email
below. A confirmation email will be sent to you!

Please consider a small donation to help cover the cost of this news
outlet. Thank you.

LEARN MORE ABOUT AGENDA
21
& THE WILDLANDS
PROJECT
at the NWRI.ORG
website.

US Counties, Cities,
begin to listen to citizens and withdraw from ICLEI

List of US Cities & Counties having membership in
ICLEI

Categories

10th
Amendment (27)

1st
Amendment (9)

2nd
Amendment (24)

Accountability
(10)

Agenda 21 (157)

America for
Sale? (1)

Citizen
Action (11)

Citizens in
Action (2)

Climate
Change (19)

Common
Core (1)

Critical
Areas Ordinances (17)

Dams (10)

Divine
Providence (1)

Drones (12)

Economy (13)

Education (7)

Environmental
Lawsuits (13)

EPA (39)

General
Discussion (4)

Govt
Agencies (141)

Grants (3)

Growth
Management Act (GMA) (27)

Healthcare (6)

ICLEI (12)

Letters
to the Editor (2)

Obamacare (2)

Privacy
Issues (8)

Property
Rights (76)

Rio+20 (8)

Smart Meters
(15)

Sovereignty
(14)

Sustainability
(28)

Taxes (13)

Trails (1)

Uncategorized
(3)

Unions (3)

United
Nations (36)

Voter Fraud
(3)

WA State DOE
(72)

WA State
News (38)

War on the
West (110)

Water Issues
(115)

Wild
Olympics (21)

Wildlands
Project (74)

Wolves (19)

« BLM Told to Revisit Montana Grazing Plan

Aberdeen, Idaho irrigation company plans for tight water supply
»

The EPA and Your Privacy?

Posted on June 13, 2013 8:55 am by Pearl Rains Hewett Comment

EPA ACKNOWLEDGES RELEASING PERSONAL DETAILS ON FARMERS,
SENATOR SLAMS
AGENCY
By Joseph Weber
Published April 09,
2013
FoxNews.com
——————————————————————–
An excerpt from this report
(full text follows)

Sen. John Thune, who originally complained about the release, slammed the EPA
for trying to retroactively recover the sensitive data.
“It is INEXCUSABLE for the EPA
to release the personal information of American families and
then call for it back, knowing full well that the erroneously released
information will never be fully returned,” he said in a statement to
FoxNews.com.

“While EPA acknowledging that it erred is a first step, more must be done to protect the personal
information of our farmers and ranchers now and in the
future.

I will continue to
demand answers from the EPA on how this information was collected and why it is
still being distributed to EXTREME environmental groups to the detriment of our
farm and ranch families.”

The information on livestock and produce farmers
was sought through a Freedom of Information Act request by the groups EARTH
JUSTICE, THE NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL AND THE PEW CHARITABLE
TRUST. They were given information on roughly 80,000
FARMERS AND RANCHERS.
Pew returned the original
information, per the agency’s request Thursday, according to documents obtained
by Fox.

The agency acknowledged the information included individual names, email
addresses, phone numbers and personal addresses.

Thune, of South Dakota, where 500
farmers and ranchers had their information made public, sent a letter Monday to
the EPA requesting the agency answer a list of questions — including whether
agency officials reviewed the information to see whether the release complied
with the federal Privacy Act of 1974.

“The EPA has threatened the health and safety of agriculture producers and
their families and has damaged the security of our food system,” Thune said.
“There is a growing gap of trust between America’s farm and ranch families and
the EPA. Much of this LACK OF TRUST IS DUE
TO EPA’S AGGRESSIVE REGULATORY AGENDA.”

Other concerns expressed by Thune, farm bureaus and others include whether
the EPA first consulted with THE
DEPARTMENTS OF AGRICULTURE AND HOMELAND SECURITY, WHICH HAD ALREADY ADVISED
AGAINST COMPILING A PUBLIC DATABASE WITH SIMILAR INFORMATION and whether the EPA
still intends to create such a record.

“Does the EPA intend to gather any more personal information on livestock
producers?” Thune asked in his letter to agency Acting Administrator Bob
Perciasepe.
——————————————————————–
My comment – Freedom of speech is
INHERENT TO AMERICAN FREEDOM

The Fourteenth Amendment (Amendment XIV) to the United States Constitution
Bingham said in a speech from March 31, 1871 that “the words ‘equal protection
of the laws’ were more than a glittering generality”, but “that they were to be
enforced to the extent of securing all guarantees of life, liberty, and property
as provided by the supreme law of the land, the Constitution of the United
States.”[60] Thus it was
Congress power to enforce laws guaranteed to all for the protection of life,
liberty and property from arbitrary government action.[60]

If SORRY WORKS as an excuse, Who’s
privacy will the EPA violate NEXT.

(continue reading if you are concerned)

———————————————————————-
The Environmental Protection Agency acknowledged
Tuesday that it released personal information on potentially thousands of
farmers and ranchers to environmental groups, following concerns from
congressional Republicans and agriculture groups that the release could endanger
their safety.

According to a document obtained by FoxNews.com, the EPA said “some of the
personal information that could have been protected … was released.” Though the
EPA has already sent out the documents, the agency now says it has since
redacted sensitive details and asked the environmental groups to “return the
information.”

But Sen. John Thune, who originally complained about the release, slammed the
EPA for trying to retroactively recover the sensitive data.

“It is INEXCUSABLE for the EPA to release the personal information of
American families and then call for it back, knowing full well that the
erroneously released information will never be fully returned,” he said in a
statement to FoxNews.com.
“While EPA acknowledging that it erred is a first
step, more must be done to protect the personal information of our farmers and
ranchers now and in the future.
I will continue to demand answers from the
EPA on how this information was collected and why it is still being distributed
to extreme environmental groups to the detriment of our farm and ranch
families.”
The information on livestock and produce farmers was sought
through a Freedom of Information Act request by the groups EARTH JUSTICE, THE
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL AND THE PEW CHARITABLE TRUST. They were given
information on roughly 80,000 FARMERS AND RANCHERS.

Pew returned the original information, per the agency’s request Thursday,
according to documents obtained by Fox.
The agency acknowledged the
information included individual names, email addresses, phone numbers and
personal addresses.
Thune, of South Dakota, where 500 farmers and ranchers
had their information made public, sent a letter Monday to the EPA requesting
the agency answer a list of questions — including whether agency officials
reviewed the information to see whether the release complied with the federal
Privacy Act of 1974.

“The EPA has threatened the health and safety of agriculture producers and
their families and has damaged the security of our food system,” Thune said.
“There is a growing gap of trust between America’s farm and ranch families and
the EPA. Much of this LACK OF TRUST IS DUE TO EPA’S AGGRESSIVE REGULATORY
AGENDA.”

Other concerns expressed by Thune, farm bureaus and others include whether
the EPA first consulted with THE DEPARTMENTS OF AGRICULTURE AND HOMELAND
SECURITY, WHICH HAD ALREADY ADVISED AGAINST COMPILING A PUBLIC DATABASE WITH
SIMILAR INFORMATION and whether the EPA still intends to create such a
record.

“Does the EPA intend to gather any more personal information on livestock
producers?” Thune asked in his letter to agency Acting Administrator Bob
Perciasepe.

The EPA said the data
was related to farms in 29 states with “concentrated animal feeding operations”
and that the released information was part of the
agency’s commitment to “ensure clean water and public-health
protection.”

The groups wanted the information,
they say, because such large-scale operations are a major source of water
pollution and they want to hold the EPA accountable for enforcing the Clean
Water Act.

Critics have characterized EARTH JUSTICE AND THE ORGANIZATIONS AS BEING
“EXTREMIST GROUPS” and say the released
information included data on family farmers who feed fewer than 1,000
animals, which excludes them from having to comply with the
Act.

“This information details my family’s home address,” J.D. Alexander, a
Nebraska cattle farmer and former president of the National Cattlemen’s Beef
Association, told FarmFuture.com. “THE ONLY THING IT DOESN’T DO IS CHAUFFEUR
THESE EXTREMISTS TO MY HOUSE.”

In response, Jon Devine, an attorney, wrote in a blog for the Natural
Resources Defense Council: “The most irresponsible charge made by NCBA is that
providing this information to public interest groups somehow may facilitate
criminal acts against facilities. That accusation is entirely unwarranted. NRDC
and Pew condemn such illegal activities.”
The EPA said the majority of the
data was already publicly available through state databases, web sites and
federal and state permits, or is required to be released under federal or state
law.

However, in response to privacy concerns raised by agricultural groups, the
agency redacted sections of information from 10 of the 29 states that contained
some personal data, the release said.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/04/09/epa-acknowledges-giving-out-personal-info-in-request-that-included-data-on/#ixzz2W6vi9FgX
———————————————————————
Monday,
June 10, 2013
EPA Turns Over Farmers’ Names to Environmental Groups: The
American Federal Government Out of Control
As one American sits scared for
his life in Hong Kong as he exposed how the NSA was spying on Americans through
their phone calls, we get another example of just how little the federal
government protects the privacy of Americans despite their Constitutional
rights. We learn today the EPA has been turning over the names of farmers it
deems dangerous to radical environmental groups.

Townhall reports of another infringement of privacy by an out of control
American federal government:

We’ve known for months now that the Environmental Protection Agency has been
leaking the private information of small farmers to radical environmental
groups, some of which are full of attorneys constantly snooping around for a
lawsuit.

According to a letter from a group of Senators to Acting EPA Administrator
Bob Perciasepe, the EPA “released farm information for 80,000 livestock
facilities in 30 states as the result of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
request from national environmental organizations. It is our understanding that
the initial release of data contained personal information that was not required
by the FOIA request for ten states including Arizona, Colorado, Georgia,
Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Montana, Nebraska, Ohio and Utah. This release
included names and personal addresses.”

The Senators sent the letter Friday to express concern over the sensitivity
of the data that was released to groups like Earth Justice, Pew Charitable Trust
and Natural Resources Defense Council and to ask how the EPA plans to protect
the data of farms and ranches that are also homes to families.

Corruption in the American federal government is at an all time high. This is
clearly a government that is out of control and no longer is of the people, by
the people, for the people. Rather, it is a force of tyranny that resembles the
Soviet police state I was taught to hate when I was a child.
Posted by
Bungalow Bill
—————————————————————
Rogue EPA Staff Spies On U.S. Farmers,
Releases Data
Posted 06/11/2013 07:04 PM ET
Privacy: As long as we’re
talking about leaks that should be prosecuted, let’s consider the leaking by the
Environmental Protection Agency of the personal data about farmers to their
environmentalist opponents.
We saw such leaking of data compiled on one group
to its political opponents in the IRS scandal. In that case, the IRS leaked the
2008 confidential financial documents of the National Organization for Marriage
to the rival Human Rights Campaign. At that time, Joe Solmonese, a left-wing
activist and Huffington Post contributor, was the president of the HRC.
Solmonese also was a 2012 Obama campaign co-chairman.
Now a letter from a
group of 24 senators to Acting EPA Administrator Bob Perciasepe claims that the
EPA has “released farm information for 80,000 livestock facilities in 30 states
as the result of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request from national
environmental organizations.”
“It is our understanding,” the senators say,
“that the initial release of data contained personal information that was not
required by the FOIA request for 10 states including Arizona, Colorado, Georgia,
Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Montana, Nebraska, Ohio and Utah. This release
included names and personal addresses.”
The data are also said to contain
even the GPS coordinates for each location.
“Unlike most regulated
facilities, farms and ranches are also homes and information regarding these
facilities should be treated and released with that understanding,” the letter
said of the data released in response to an FOIA request by Earth Justice, the
Natural Resources Defense Council and the Pew Charitable Trust.
From
unrestricted NSA surveillance to IRS “special scrutiny” of Tea Party groups,
invasions of privacy seem par for the course by an administration that wants to
know everything about everybody, use that information as a weapon of
intimidation and, at least in the case of the NSA, keep it stored forever in a
massive facility being built in Utah.
Not long ago Nebraska’s congressional
delegation sent an angry letter to then-EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson
complaining that the EPA had exceeded its legislative and constitutional
authority by conducting drone surveillance flights over Nebraska and Iowa farms
looking for violations of the Clean Water Act.
It’s no wonder Jackson used
secret email accounts to conduct her business, even to the point of creating a
fake identity, “Richard Windsor,” to hide what she needed to keep hidden and
evade open-records laws.
Drones, fake identities and now the EPA releasing
personal data to activists’ political enemies. Big Brother is really watching
us. Will anyone be prosecuted? Can this administration be trusted?

Read More At Investor’s Business Daily: http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/061113-659663-epa-spies-on-farmers-releases-data.htm#ixzz2W6vG51yh
Follow
us: @IBDinvestors on Twitter | InvestorsBusinessDaily on Facebook

This entry was posted in Constitutional Rights,
FEDERAL ISSUES AND REFORM.

Search Citizen Review
(Current News - from Jan. 2012 to
present)

Note about Searching this Website

If you wish to use this website to research by topic or keyword, there are
TWO search engines - one for the current stories as posted in our Wordpress
format, and the ARCHIVE search engines, which goes back in time to 1999.
Be sure to use both to access stories relative to your search that covers
both time periods. - Ed.

Search Citizen Review ARCHIVES for keywords, stories

UN Agenda 21
ICLEI Listings

Cities withdraw from
ICLEI

UN Agenda 21,
Sustainability

A-21 –
Your Neighborhood

Agenda
21 Video – DeWeese

The
Wildlands Project

Henry Lamb Video
-Wildlands

Overpopulation – a myth

Real Time Debt Clock

Climate Depot

The 9-12 Project

Four C website

WRIA 17 / Shoreline Mgmt.

Clallam
Watershed Plan

Stormwater
Stories

Statistics

Links and
Resources

2011-2012 Stories

Trails

Solutions

Immigration
Issue

Jefferson
Co. WA News

GMA
& Agenda 21

Critical Areas
Ordinance

Junk
Science

Climate
Realists References

Overpopulation:
Fact or Myth?

Development
Rights

Truth or Fiction

Made in the USA

The
Delphi Technique

San Juan Islands Blog

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this
message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment for non-profit
research and educational purposes only. [Ref.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml]

Home | Donate | Subscribe
| Contact Us

Copyright © 1993 - 2013. All Rights Reserved Citizen Review Online.

Designed by Dynamic Graphics Website Development.